Background: The activity over cellular genetic pattern of ionizing rad
iation can produce stochastic and unspecific damages. Interventional c
ardiology operators have increasing exposure times to ionizing radiati
on and there is no information about the real protection conferred by
simple radiological protection devices. Aim: To assess the magnitude o
f secondary ionizing radiation exposure of operators during convention
al coronary arteriography, evaluating the radiation exposure during di
fferent beam projections and the usefulness of leaded aprons. Material
and methods: Ionizing radiation received by operators during coronary
arteriography was measured using a Geiger-Muller Victoreen model 490
counter. The device was placed in the ventral region, covered by the l
eaded apron and in the unprotected dorsal region. Radiation was measur
ed in right and left projections during fluoroscopy and shooting. Resu
lts: In right projection, the intensity of ionizing radiation in ventr
al and dorsal regions was 1.24 +/- 1.1 and 2.9 +/- 4 mR/h respectively
(p= 0.08). In left projection, the figures were 2.95 +/- 3 and 7.86 /- 7.2 mR/h respectively (p= 0.001). During shooting in left projectio
n the radiation exposure in ventral and dorsal regions was 9.66 +/- 6.
7 and 32.8 +/- 27 mR/h respectively (p< 0.001). during shooting in rig
ht projection that figures were 10.1 +/- 16 and 20.7 +/- 39.8 mR/h res
pectively (p= 0.09). No correlation between radiation exposure and pat
ients surface area was observed. Conclusions: Secondary radiation rece
ived by operators is higher during shooting and in left projections. L
eaded apron confers a partial protection for ventral region, and great
fluctuations in the magnitude of radiation exposure were recorded. Un
protected dorsal region receives a greater amount of radiation in left
projections.