This paper evaluates the use of the concept of 'diaspora' as an altern
ative way of thinking about transnational migration and ethnic relatio
ns to those ways that rely on 'race' and 'ethnicity'. It examines the
heuristic potential of the concept, as a descriptive typological tool
and as a social condition and societal process. Both approaches are de
scribed and key elements within each are assessed. It is argued that a
lthough very different in emphasis, and though containing different st
rengths and weaknesses, both approaches are problematised by their rel
iance on a notion of deterritorialised ethnicity which references the
primordial bonds of 'homeland'. It is also argued that both approaches
are unable to attend fully to 'intersectionality', that is to issues
of class, gender and trans-ethnic alliances. It is concluded that alth
ough potentially enabling a broader sweep of questions that can relate
to the transnational aspects of population movements and settlement,
the concept of 'diaspora', as it has been articulated so far, does not
overcome fully some of the problems identified with the 'ethnicity' p
roblematic.