Mirror-self-recognition is usually indicated by an organism's passing
the mark test-that is, wiping a mark off its face upon observing its r
eflection in a mirror or on a video-screen. Two theories are presented
to explain mirror-self-recognition. One theory relies upon the organi
sm making an inductive (plausible but not necessary) inference utilizi
ng (1) mature kinesthetic-visual matching and (2) understanding of mir
ror-correspondence. The other theory relies upon the organism making a
deductive inference, and this theory states that necessary and suffic
ient conditions for mirror-self-recognition are (1) fully understandin
g object permanence, (2) understanding mirror-correspondence, and (3)
objectifying body-parts. Both theories suggest that limited self-knowl
edge is required for mirror-self-recognition. Available evidence suppo
rts both theories to some degree. Organisms passing the mark test may
not, however, be recognizing their own images: human infants passing t
he mark test also attempt to wipe a mark off their face upon observing
another human with a mark on its face. Passing the mark test, then, m
ay result solely from an organism's wondering if it is similar to othe
r organisms in having a mark on its face, with the idea that it may be
similar deriving from imitation via kinesthetic-visual matching. Self
-recognition is variable in different species and during human ontogen
y, such that variable explanations may be required for different speci
es and at different ages. Humans appear unique in using mirrors to cre
ate an image of themselves to conform to others' desires concerning th
eir appearance, thereby exhibiting a ''reflective self-awareness'' whi
ch incorporates their awareness of another's perspective into their ow
n self-awareness.