The National Agricultural Research Systems (NARSs) in sub-Saharan Afri
ca have made enormous progress over the past four decades in replacing
European with African scientists, increasing the number of scientists
and shifting priorities from export to food crops. Nevertheless, most
NARSs are having difficulty in producing a steady stream of new techn
ologies for small-scale farms and in generating adequate financial sup
port from their government. Zimbabwe and Malawi are among the first co
untries in Africa to mount indigenous-led reforms of their NARSs. This
paper documents the steps taken by the Agricultural Research Council
of Zimbabwe to generate a consensus among scientists, farmers and poli
cy makers to reform the National Agricultural Research System by incre
asing the voice of smallholders and other stakeholders in setting rese
arch priorities, making scientists more accountable to smallholders an
d generating new sources of financial support from user fees and taxes
on commodities. Malawi is pursuing a commodity approach to revitalizi
ng its NARSs. The experience of both Zimbabwe and Malawi has shown tha
t there is no blueprint for reforming NARSs in Africa. Donors can assi
st the reform process by supporting local initiatives to craft smallho
lder-driven research systems that are staffed with accountable scienti
sts who are adequately financed from local sources. (C) 1998 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.