This paper evaluates the current use of the Principal Agent Model (PAM
) in accounting and finance, focusing on the agent's use of private in
formation. The agent's behavioral norms in the the PAM deviate from co
mmonly held ethical values in society, from models of man in conventio
nal economic theory, and also from behavioral foundations of related b
usiness school fields like corporate strategy, business ethics, and hu
man resource management. Still, it would be unwise to reject the PAM s
olely because of its distasteful ethical assumptions. The model does a
ppear to have predictive power, but its descriptive or normative quali
ties remain unexplored. The popularity of the PAM, with its extreme mo
del of man, raises fundamental questions about the impact of this mode
l on business school stakeholders and society at large.