Ie. Goldberg et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ENDOMORPHIN-1 AND ENDOMORPHIN-2 IN MOUSE-BRAIN, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 286(2), 1998, pp. 1007-1013
The recently isolated peptides endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 have be
en suggested to be the endogenous ligands for the mu receptor. In trad
itional opioid receptor binding assays in mouse brain homogenates, bot
h endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 competed both mu(1) and mu(2) recept
or sites quite potently. Neither compound had appreciable affinity for
either delta or kappa, receptors, confirming an earlier report. Howev
er, the two endomorphins displayed reasonable affinities for kappa, bi
nding sites, with K-i values between 20 and 30 nM. Both endomorphins c
ompeted H-3-[D-Ala(2),MePhe(4),Gly(ol)(5)] enkephalin binding to MOR-I
receptors expressed in CHO cells with high affinity. In mouse brain h
omogenates I-125-endomorphin-1 and I-125-endomorphin-2 binding was sel
ectively competed by mu ligands, I-125-Endomorphin-1 and I-125-endomor
phin-2 also labeled MOR-I receptors expressed in CHO cells with high a
ffinity. Autoradiography of the two I-125-labeled endomorphins demonst
rated regional patterns in the brain similar to those previously obser
ved for mu drugs. Pharmacologically, the endomorphins were potent anal
gesics. Although they were equipotent supraspinally, endomorphin-1 was
more potent spinally. Endomorphin analgesia was effectively blocked b
y naloxone, as well as the mu-selective antagonists beta-funaltrexamin
e and naloxonazine. In CXBK mice, which are insensitive to supraspinal
morphine, neither endomorphin was active, consistent with a mu mechan
ism of action. Finally, the endomorphins inhibited gastrointestinal tr
ansit. In conclusion, these results support the mu selectivity of thes
e agents.