The use of combined sensors and advanced algorithms using different pr
inciples can improve rate performance over a single sensor system. Com
binations of sensors and more sophisticated algorithms, however, invar
iably increase the complexity of pacemaker programming. An automatical
ly optimized combined minute ventilation and activity DDDR pacemaker w
as developed to minimize repeated sensor adjustment. The device used s
ubthreshold (below cardiac stimulation threshold) lead impedance to de
tect lead configuration at implantation automatically, followed by ''i
mplant management,'' including setting of lead polarity and initiation
of DDDR pacing. Automatic sensor adaptation was achieved by programmi
ng a ''target rate histogram '' based on the patient's activity level
and frequency of exertion, and the rate profile optimization process m
atched the recorded integrated sensor response to the target rate hist
ogram profile. In nine patients implanted with the DX2 pacemakers, the
implant management gave 100% accuracy in the detection of lead polari
ty. Rate profile optimization automatically increased the pacing rate
during exercise between discharge and 3-month follow-up (hall walk: 78
+/- 3 vs 98 +/- 3 beats/min, and maximal treadmill exercise: 89 +/- 6
vs 115 +/- 5 beats/min, P < 0.001) with a significant increase in exe
rcise duration during maximal exercise (7.18 +/- 2 min vs 9.56 +/- 2 m
in, P = 0.05). The accuracy of rate profile optimization versus manual
programming was assessed at I month, and there was no significant dif
ference between pacing rate kinetics and maximal pacing rate between t
he two methods of programming. In conclusion, pacemaker automaticity c
an be initiated at implantation and the self-optimized rate adaptive r
esponse appeared to be comparable to that derived from a manual progra
mming procedure, which may reduce the need to perform time consuming s
ensor programming.