Throughout a g-month period during which 1,125 Holter tapes were revie
wed prospectively we identified 13 nonmedicated patients with an arrhy
thmia, which for the purposes of this:presentation was categorized, be
cause of their mode of initiation, as sudden Wenckebach periods (WP).
The episodes emerged abruptly from a normal (less than or equal to 200
ms) PR interval with sudden prolongation of PR and PP intervals (and
reversed PR-RP relationship) that took place over 1-8 cycles. The post
paced PR interval was shorter than that of the last conducted beat. Th
e episodes were separated into two groups. Group I included 11 patient
s with symptoms other than syncope and Group II included 2 patients wi
th syncope, There were 26 episodes of sudden WP in Group I. Twenty-fiv
e terminated in a single (and one in double) blocked P waves. Most epi
sodes occurred between 10 PM and 7 AM. Symptoms did not correlate with
the episodes. Mean 24-hour rates were < 90. In Group II there were 22
episodes, all occurring between 6 AM and 10 PM. The mean sinus cycle
lengths before the phenomenon started to occur in Group I(861 +/- 185
ms) as well as the cycle lengths at the onset of block (1,096 +/- 215
ms) were statistically longer than those in Group II (592 +/- 40 ms an
d 747 +/- 63 ms, respectively, P < 0.0001). Although the mode of onset
in the episodes in Group II was similar to Group 1, 26 episodes termi
nated in 2-6 blocked P waves. Thus, the entire number of episodes coul
d be categorized as an unusual type (because of the PR prolongation) o
f paroxysmal, or advanced second degree AV block. Because these patien
ts had negative electrophysiological studies, positive tilt tests, and
absent syncope after oral propranolol therapy, they were considered a
s having neurocardiogenic syncope. In addition, the faster than normal
(> 100) mean 24-hour rates) suggested that they also had so-called in
appropriate sinus tachycardia. In summary, Group I consisted of patien
ts with a normal, benign, vagal-induced second-degree AV block, wherea
s the Holter findings in Group II appeared to reflect unusual (but nat
ural, i.e., nonprovoked) electrocardiographic manifestations of certai
n patients with neurocardiogenic syncope.