PROGRESSION OF JOINT DAMAGE IN EARTH ACTIVE SEVERE RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS DURING 18 MONTHS OF TREATMENT - COMPARISON OF LOW-DOSE CYCLOSPORINEAND PARENTERAL GOLD
Hk. Zeidler et al., PROGRESSION OF JOINT DAMAGE IN EARTH ACTIVE SEVERE RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS DURING 18 MONTHS OF TREATMENT - COMPARISON OF LOW-DOSE CYCLOSPORINEAND PARENTERAL GOLD, British journal of rheumatology (Print), 37(8), 1998, pp. 874-882
Objective This study compared the progression of joint damage in patie
nts with early active seven rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with cyc
losporin or parenteral gold. Methods. In this open, randomized, multic
entre study with a blinded radiological endpoint, 375 patients who had
suffered from active severe RA for < 3 yr were randomized to be treat
ed for 18 months with low-dose cyclosporin or parenteral gold. The gro
ups were stratified with regard to corticosteroid use. Primary efficac
y variables were numbers of erosions, erosion score and the Larsen-Dal
e joint damage score. Results. Joint damage progressed at similar rate
s in both treatment arms. In both groups, patients receiving corticost
eroids had less X-ray progression. Rheumatoid factor positivity, high
swollen joint count, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate and pre-exist
ing X-ray abnormalities predicted progression of joint damage. Althoug
h numbers of serious adverse events were similar, more gold patients (
n = 65) than cyclosporin patients (n = 45) withdrew from study medicat
ion because of adverse events. Conclusion. Cyclosporin was comparable
to parenteral gold in retarding progression of joint damage and was be
tter tolerated in terms of adherence to therapy. The open label design
should be kept in mind when assessing this difference.