I. Harper et al., LACK OF EFFICACY OF PROPOFOL IN THE TREATMENT OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING, Anaesthesia and intensive care, 26(4), 1998, pp. 366-370
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
The anti-nauseant efficacy of low-dose propofol was investigated in a
blinded, randomized trial. Patients who complained of nausea and/or vo
miting following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery and who requested
antiemetic were randomly assigned to receive placebo, propofol 3 mg,
propofol 9 mg or propofol 27 mg by intravenous injection. Nausea, vomi
ting and sedation were recorded by a blinded observer for 90 minutes f
ollowing administration of the test drug, prior to discharge, and 24 h
ours following surgery. Rescue antiemetic (droperidol 1.0 mg IV) was a
vailable from 10 minutes after administration of test drug. Propofol f
ailed to reduce nausea scores and dod not reduce the incidence of vomi
ting. Numbers of patients receiving rescue antiemetic were similar in
the four treatment groups. In the first 10 minutes following test drug
administration, sedation scores were increased by propofol in a dose-
related manner: We conclude that, in the dose range studied, propofol
is ineffective for the treatment of nausea and vomiting occurring soon
after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.