M. Selman et al., COLCHICINE, D-PENICILLAMINE, AND PREDNISONE IN THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS - A CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL, Chest, 114(2), 1998, pp. 507-512
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Study objective: We compared the long-term efficacy of the combination
of colchicine and/or D-penicillamine with prednisone, in comparison t
o prednisone alone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF
), Design: Nonrandomized prospective study in patients with IPF confir
med by biopsy specimen. Setting: National Institute of Respiratory Dis
eases, Mexico. Patients: Fifty-six IPF patients were included in this
study. Patients received either colchicine/ prednisone (n=19), D-penic
illamine/prednisone (n=11), D-penicillamine/colchicine/prednisone (n=1
1), or prednisone alone (n=15), Prednisone therapy was started at 1.0
mg/kg/d for 1 month followed by a biweekly taper to a maintenance dose
of 15 mg/d, Colchicine was administered at a daily dose of 1.0 mg, an
d D-penicillamine was given at a daily dose of 600 mg, Measurements an
d results: Response to therapy was assessed by changes in lung functio
n test results as measured by total and vital lung capacities, arteria
l blood gas analysis at rest breathing room air, and survival. No sign
ificant differences either in lung mechanics or in arterial gases were
found in any group relative to the baseline measurement. Thirteen of
the 56 patients died during the first 2 years, and 29 were dead at 5 y
ears follow-up. Comparison of survival curves by Cox regression model
showed no statistically significant difference among the four groups.
Known side effects attributable to prednisone were more common and sev
ere than those attributable to the other drugs. Conclusions: Our resul
ts suggest that neither colchicine nor D-penicillamine modified the pr
ogressive course of prednisone-treated IPF, and that the search for ne
w drugs is imperative.