P. Franks et K. Fiscella, PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS AND SPECIALISTS AS PERSONAL PHYSICIANS - HEALTH-CARE EXPENDITURES AND MORTALITY EXPERIENCE, Journal of family practice, 47(2), 1998, pp. 105-109
BACKGROUND. The advent of managed care has resulted in considerable de
bate regarding the relative effects of specialist and primary care on
patient outcomes and costs. Studies on these subjects have been limite
d to a disease-focused orientation rather than a patient-focused orien
tation inherent in primary care management. We examined whether person
s using a primary care physician have lower expenditures and mortality
than those using a specialist as their personal physician. METHODS. U
sing data on a nationally representative sample of 13,270 adult respon
dents to the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey reporting as the
ir personal physician either a primary care physician (general practit
ioner, family physician, internist, or obstetrician-gynecologist) or a
specialist, we examined total annual health care expenditures and 5-y
ear mortality experience. RESULTS. Respondents with a primary care phy
sician, rather than a specialist, as a personal physician were more li
kely to be women, white, live in rural areas, report fewer medical dia
gnoses and higher health perceptions and have lower annual health care
expenditures (mean: $2029 vs $3100) and lower mortality (hazard ratio
= 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 - 0.90). After adjustment
for demographics, health insurance status, reported diagnoses, health
perceptions, and smoking status, respondents reporting using a primary
care physician compared with those using a specialist had 33% lower a
nnual adjusted health care expenditures and lower adjusted mortality (
hazard ratio = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66 - 0.98). CONCLUSIONS. These findings
provide evidence for the cost-effective role of primary care physicia
ns in the health care system. More research is needed an how to optima
lly integrate primary and specialty care.