PICOSECOND TIME-RESOLVED RESONANCE RAMAN-SPECTRUM OF A K-INTERMEDIATEIN THE PHOTOREACTION OF THE ARTIFICIAL BACTERIORHODOPSIN PIGMENT BR6.11

Citation
Jk. Delaney et al., PICOSECOND TIME-RESOLVED RESONANCE RAMAN-SPECTRUM OF A K-INTERMEDIATEIN THE PHOTOREACTION OF THE ARTIFICIAL BACTERIORHODOPSIN PIGMENT BR6.11, Journal of physical chemistry, 97(47), 1993, pp. 12416-12422
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Physical
ISSN journal
00223654
Volume
97
Issue
47
Year of publication
1993
Pages
12416 - 12422
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3654(1993)97:47<12416:PTRROA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The resonance Raman (RR) spectrum of a K-intermediate formed during th e photoreaction of an artificial bacteriorhodopsin (BR) pigment (deriv ed from E-11,20 ethanoretinal) containing a six-membered ring spanning the C-11=C-12-C-13 region of the retinal chromophore (BR6.11) is reco rded by picosecond time-resolved resonance Raman (PTR3) spectroscopy. A recent study of the BR6.11 photoreaction utilizing picosecond transi ent absorption and picosecond time-resolved fluorescence measurements revealed that (i) a J-intermediate (J6.11) appears within <3 ps and de cays to form a K-intermediate, K6.11/1, with a 12 +/- 3 ps time consta nt and (ii) a second K-intermediate, K6.11/2, is subsequently formed f rom K6.11/1 with an almost-equal-to 100-ps time constant. The RR spect rum of K6.11/2, measured here by PTR3 at a 300-ps delay, differs signi ficantly from that of BR6.11, thereby demonstrating that structural ch anges in the retinal chromophore occur as K6.11/2 is formed. Given the location of the six-membered ring in BR6.11, these structural changes cannot involve isomerization and/or rotation in the C-11=C-12-C-13 re gion of retinal. Changes in other regions of the retinal and/or involv ing the surrounding protein must account for the differences observed in the RR spectra of BR6.11 and K6.11/2. A comparison of the RR spectr a from native K-590 (50-ps delay) and K6.11/2, recorded by PTR3 spectr oscopy under the same experimental conditions, reveals both similariti es and differences (e.g., the most prominent features appear in the C- C and C=C stretching regions while the maxima positions and relative i ntensities are significantly different).