H. Lamberts et al., THE CLASSIFICATION OF MENTAL-DISORDERS IN PRIMARY-CARE - A GUIDE THROUGH A DIFFICULT TERRAIN, International journal of psychiatry in medicine, 28(2), 1998, pp. 159-176
Background: Primary care physicians traditionally have a strong intere
st in the mental health of their patients. Three classification system
s are available for them to diagnose, label, and classify mental disor
ders: 1) The ICD-10 approach with three options, 2) The DSM-IV approac
h with two options, and 3) the ICPC approach with two options. This ar
ticle lists important similarities and differences between the systems
to help potential users choose the option that best meets their needs
. Methods: Definitions for depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and
somatization disorder are compared on five characteristics of classifi
cation: 1. the domain, 2. the scope, 3. the nature of the definitions,
4. focus on episodes of care, and 5. clinical guidelines. Results: Pr
imary care physicians and psychiatrists have different perspectives, r
eflected in different classifications. Each system has specific possib
ilities and limitations with regard to the diagnosis of mental disorde
rs. For common mental disorders it is possible, however, to choose cod
es from one system while maintaining compatibility with the other two.
Comparability as to the diagnostic content of the different classes,
however, is more difficult to establish. The available classification
systems give both primary care physicians and psychiatrists options to
diagnose, label, and to classify mental disorders from their own pers
pective, but once a system has been chosen the clinical comparability
of a patient with the same diagnosis in other systems is limited. Conc
lusion: Compatibility among systems can be optimized by strictly follo
wing a number of rules. The conversion between ICPC and ICD-10 land co
nsequently DSM-IV) allows simultaneous use of ICPC and ICD-10 as a cla
ssification and DSM-IV as the standard nomenclature. This is of partic
ular interest for computer based patient records in primary care. The
clinical comparability of the same diagnosis in different systems howe
ver is limited by the characteristics of the different system.