THERMODYNAMICS OF PHOSPHINE COORDINATION TO THE [PNP]RH-I FRAGMENT - AN EXAMPLE OF THE IMPORTANCE OF REORGANIZATION ENERGIES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METAL-LIGAND BOND STRENGTHS
Jk. Huang et al., THERMODYNAMICS OF PHOSPHINE COORDINATION TO THE [PNP]RH-I FRAGMENT - AN EXAMPLE OF THE IMPORTANCE OF REORGANIZATION ENERGIES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF METAL-LIGAND BOND STRENGTHS, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 120(31), 1998, pp. 7806-7815
Reaction enthalpies of the complexes [RPNP]Rh(COE) ([RPNP] = N(SiMe2CH
2PPh2)(2), N(SiMe2-(CH2PPr2)-Pr-i)(2); COE = cyclooctene) with a serie
s of phosphine ligands and CO have been measured by solution calorimet
ry. The measured enthalpies span range of ca. 40 kcal/mol. These syste
ms favor coordination of strong pi-acceptor/weak sigma-donor ligands a
s shown by the trend in Delta H-rxn: CO much greater than Ppyrl(3)' >
Ppyrl(3) > PPhpyrl(2) > PPh(2)pyrl > PPh3. This trend is exactly the o
pposite of that observed in another square planar rhodium(I); system,
trans-RhCl(CO)(PZ(3))(2). With the exception of CO, the ligands invest
igated are isosteric, and so the observed trends are electronic in nat
ure. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies on several of theses com
plexes ([RPNP]RhL where R, L = Ph, PPh3; Ph, Ppyrl(3); Ph, CO; Pr-i, P
Ph3; Pr-i, Ppyrl(3); Pr-i, CO; Pr-i, COE) have been performed. Althoug
h the structural trends are readily understood in:terms of the electro
nic (donor/acceptor) nature of each ligand array, it is not obvious th
at the structural data predict the trends or, in particular, the trend
reversal in Delta H-rxn in the two Rh(I) systems. Rather, these resul
ts illustrate the importance of reorganization energies in thermodynam
ic analyses of metal-ligand bonding, especially in the presence of syn
ergistic bonding involving sigma-donor, pi-donor, and pi-acceptor liga
nds, interacting through shared metal orbitals (electron push-pull). I
n such cases the interpretation of a metal-ligand bond dissociation en
thalpy (D) as an intrinsic, universal, and transferable property of th
at bond (e.g., a ''bond strength'') is an invalid proposition.