Cp. Kolbert et al., BRANCHED-DNA ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF THE MECA GENE IN OXACILLIN-RESISTANT AND OXACILLIN-SENSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI, Journal of clinical microbiology, 36(9), 1998, pp. 2640-2644
The identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus isolates in
the clinical laboratory has typically been performed by using methods
that detect phenotypic expression of resistance determinants. However
, these methods may be difficult to interpret and some isolates do not
express resistance until selective pressure is administered. Assays t
hat detect genetic determinants are not subject to these limitations a
nd have been effective in distinguishing isolates that are capable of
expressing the resistance phenotype. In this study, a novel branched D
NA (bDNA) hybridization assay was used to test for the mecA gene in 41
6 clinical staphylococcal isolates, The results were compared with tho
se obtained by a PCR-based assay and oxacillin disk diffusion. For 155
Staphylococcus aureus and 261 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isola
tes, the bDNA assay and PCR results mere 100% concordant. Among the S.
aureus isolates, 20 mere MecA(+) and 135 were MecA(-). For the coagul
ase-negative staphylococci, 150 were MecA(+) and 111 were MecA(-). The
results from the genotypic detection methods were compared with those
obtained by oxacillin disk diffusion. No discrepancies were detected
among the S. amarts isolates; however, 10 coagulase-negative isolates
were MecA(+) but oxacillin sensitive and 1 isolate was MecA(-) but oxa
cillin resistant. Oxacillin resistance was induced in 6 of the 10 MecA
(+) isolates previously classified as oxacillin sensitive. These resul
ts suggest that the bDNA method described here is a sensitive and effi
cient method for detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci
and that genetic detection methods may be useful for detection of pote
ntial methicillin resistance in the clinical laboratory.