Pa. Meier et al., AN EPIDEMIC OF PRESUMED ACANTHAMOEBA-KERATITIS THAT FOLLOWED REGIONALFLOODING RESULTS OF - A CASE-CONTROL INVESTIGATION, Archives of ophthalmology, 116(8), 1998, pp. 1090-1094
Objectives: To investigate an outbreak of presumed Acanthamoeba kerati
tis (AK), to identify risk factors associated with its development, an
d to characterize the changing epidemiology of AK. Methods: We perform
ed a pairwise-matched case-control study involving 31 patients who wer
e diagnosed as having AK between July 1993 and December 1994. Risk fac
tors were identified using conditional logistic regression analysis. T
o investigate the impact of regional flooding, we stratified counties
within Iowa by whether their water facilities were affected and then c
alculated population-based estimates of the incidence of AK. Results:
During the study, 43 presumed incident cases of AK were diagnosed; 31
were included in the case-control study. Cases were diagnosed based on
the clinical presentation of keratitis, positive tandem scanning conf
ocal microscopy examination results, and confirmatory cytopathologic f
indings. There were no positive culture specimens. On average, cases h
ad symptoms for 8 weeks before diagnosis, most notably photophobia (94
%), red eyes (94%), and pain (80%). Contact lens use (odds ratio [OR]
= 44.16; P = .02) and fishing (OR = 22.62; P = .04) were independent p
redictors of the development of AK. The presence of a humidifier in th
e home (OR = 0.08; P = .03) and having household water that originated
from a private well instead of the municipal water supply (OR = 0.12;
P = .08) were protective. Twenty-nine of 30 cases resided in counties
in which the water supplies were affected by flooding as determined b
y the Department of Natural Resources, Des Moines, Iowa. The incidence
of AK in these counties was more than 10 times higher than that in th
e unaffected counties (relative risk = 10.83, 95% confidence interval,
1.48-79.49; P < .003). Conclusions: We describe an epidemic of kerati
tis that, based on clinicopathologic and epidemiological evidence, is
consistent with AK. As in previous outbreaks of culture-proven AK, con
tact lens use was the major risk factor. Both the results of the case-
control study and the population-based incidence estimates suggest tha
t the recent outbreak may be caused, in part, by the effects of region
al flooding. However, because the outbreak also coincided with a chang
e in diagnostic techniques, we cannot eliminate recognition bias as th
e reason for the apparently changing epidemiology.