Pe. Mazmanian et al., INFORMATION ABOUT BARRIERS TO PLANNED CHANGE - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL INVOLVING CONTINUING MEDICAL-EDUCATION LECTURES AND COMMITMENTTO CHANGE, Academic medicine, 73(8), 1998, pp. 882-886
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal","Education, Scientific Disciplines","Medical Informatics
Purpose. To determine whether practicing physicians receiving only cli
nical information at a traditional continuing medical education (CME)
lecture (control group) and physicians receiving clinical information
plus information about barriers to behavioral change (study group) wou
ld alter their clinical behaviors at the same rate. Method. In a rando
mized controlled trial, the investigators matched 13 pairs of U.S. and
Canadian medical schools, assigning one school from each pair to stud
y or control conditions. Following the commitment-to-change model, the
investigators asked the primary care physicians attending control or
study lectures on the management of cardiovascular risks whether they
intended to make behavioral changes as a result of participating in th
e lectures and, if so, to indicate the specific changes. Thirty to 45
days later, the investigators surveyed the responding physicians to le
arn whether they had implemented those changes. Results. Information a
bout barriers to change did not increase the likelihood that physician
s in the study group would report successful changes; they were no mor
e likely to change than those in the control group. However, the physi
cians in both study and control groups were significantly more likely
to change (47% vs 7%, p<.001) if they indicated an intent to change im
mediately following the lecture. Conclusions. Successful change in pra
ctice may depend less on clinical and barriers information than on oth
er factors that influence physicians' performances. To further develop
the commitment-to-change strategy in measuring the effects of planned
change, it is important to isolate and learn the powers of individual
components of the strategy as well as their collective influence on p
hysicians' clinical behaviors.