Bl. Schmidt et al., THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE AURICULOTEMPORAL NERVE AROUND THE TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 86(2), 1998, pp. 165-168
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,Surgery,"Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Objective. The purpose of this cadaver dissection was to study the pos
ition of the auriculotemporal nerve in relation to the mandibular cond
yle, capsular tissues, articular fossa, and lateral pterygoid muscle a
nd to evaluate the anatomic possibility of nerve impingement or irrita
tion by the surrounding structures. Study design. Eight cadaveric head
s (16 sides) were dissected. The auriculotemporal nerve was identified
by following its course around the middle meningeal artery. The cours
e of the nerve trunk was dissected from the middle meningeal artery to
the terminal branches within the temporomandibular disk. The horizont
al distance between the auriculotemporal nerve and the medial portion
of the condyle/condylar neck was measured. The vertical distance from
the most superior portion of the articular condyle to the superior bor
der of the auriculotemporal nerve was measured. Results, The auriculot
emporal nerve was identified on each side, and a single trunk was evid
ent along the medial aspect of the condylar neck. At the posterior bor
der of the lateral pterygoid muscle, the nerve trunk was in direct con
tact with the condylar neck in every specimen. The average vertical di
stance between the superior condyle and the nerve was 7.06 mm (+/- 3.2
1 mm); the range was 0 to 13 mm. The vertical distance between the ner
ve and the superior condyle on one side of the specimen did not correl
ate with the distance on the contralateral side. Conclusion. The auric
ulotemporal nerve trunk has a close anatomic relationship with the con
dyle and the temporomandibular joint capsular region, and there is evi
dence of a possible mechanism for sensory disturbances in the temporom
andibular joint region. In all cases, the nerve was in direct contact
with the medial aspect of the capsule or condylar neck. Because there
is no correlation between the positions of the nerves on the right and
left sides, only one side may be affected. The nerve was also observe
d to course in direct apposition to the lateral pterygoid muscle. The
findings support the hypothesis that the anatomic and clinical relatio
nship of the auriculotemporal nerve to the condyle, articular fossa, a
nd lateral pterygoid muscle may be causally related to compression or
irritation of the nerve, producing numbness or pain, or both, in the t
emporomandibular joint region.