RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING MONTHLY LOW-DOSE LEUCOVORIN AND FLUOROURACIL BOLUS WITH WEEKLY HIGH-DOSE 48-HOUR CONTINUOUS-INFUSION FLUOROURACIL FOR ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER - A SPANISH COOPERATIVE GROUP FOR GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOR-THERAPY (TTD) STUDY
E. Aranda et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING MONTHLY LOW-DOSE LEUCOVORIN AND FLUOROURACIL BOLUS WITH WEEKLY HIGH-DOSE 48-HOUR CONTINUOUS-INFUSION FLUOROURACIL FOR ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER - A SPANISH COOPERATIVE GROUP FOR GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOR-THERAPY (TTD) STUDY, Annals of oncology, 9(7), 1998, pp. 727-731
Purpose: The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the ef
ficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)
given by bolus injection together with intravenous leucovorin (LV) ve
rsus high-dose 5-FU in continuous infusion (CI) in the treatment of ad
vanced colorectal cancer. Patients and methods. A total of 306 patient
s were randomized to receive either 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) given by bolus in
jection on days 1-5 plus intravenous (i.v.) LV 20 mg/m(2) every four t
o five weeks or 5-FU 3.5 g/m(2)/week in a 48-hour CI. Therapy was cont
inued until disease progression. Second-line chemotherapy was allowed
in both arms. Results: The response rates in 306 patients with measura
ble lesions were 19.2% (modulated arm) and 30.3% (CI arm, P < 0.05). T
he median progression-free survival times were 23.5 weeks (modulated a
rm) and 25 weeks (CI arm, P = NS). Median survival times were 42.5 wee
ks (modulated arm) and 48 weeks (CI arm: P = NS). There were no signif
icant differences in grade 3-4 toxicity profiles but if we consider al
l grades we observed more mucositis in the modulated arm and more hand
-foot syndrome in the CI arm. Conclusions: In terms of response rate,
the continuous infusion regimen was more effective than the modulated
regimen. There was no significant difference in survival and time to p
rogression, and none in grade 3-4 toxicity.