EFFECTS OF REAL AND IMAGINED TRAINING ON VOLUNTARY MUSCLE ACTIVATION DURING MAXIMAL ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS

Citation
Rd. Herbert et al., EFFECTS OF REAL AND IMAGINED TRAINING ON VOLUNTARY MUSCLE ACTIVATION DURING MAXIMAL ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 163(4), 1998, pp. 361-368
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
ISSN journal
00016772
Volume
163
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
361 - 368
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-6772(1998)163:4<361:EORAIT>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
In this study we directly tested the hypothesis that isometric strengt h training increases voluntary drive to muscles. In addition, it was a ttempted to replicate the findings of an earlier study that showed ima gined training increases voluntary strength as much as actual training , as this finding provides key support for the hypothesis that trainin g increases voluntary drive (Yue & Cole 1992). Fifty-four subjects wer e randomly allocated to groups that performed 8 weeks of isometric tra ining of the elbow flexor muscles, imagined isometric training, or a c ontrol task involving the lower limbs. Voluntary isometric strength an d activation of the elbow flexor muscles were measured before and afte r training. Voluntary activation was measured with a sensitive form of twitch interpolation. Training, imagined training and control groups increased voluntary isometric elbow flexor strength by means of 17.8% (+/-3.1 SEM), 6.8% (+/-2.6) and 6.5% (+/-3.0), respectively. The train ing group increased in strength significantly more than imagined train ing and control groups (P = 0.01 for both comparisons), but the small difference between imagined training and control groups was not signif icant (P = 0.31). Prior to training, voluntary activation of all subje cts was high (96.2 +/- 0.5%). This did not change significantly with t raining and there were no significant differences between groups. Thes e data challenge the hypothesis that training of the elbow flexor musc les increases isometric strength by inducing adaptations of the centra l nervous system, because they show that training does not increase vo luntary activation and imagined training does not increase strength.