Rd. Herbert et al., EFFECTS OF REAL AND IMAGINED TRAINING ON VOLUNTARY MUSCLE ACTIVATION DURING MAXIMAL ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 163(4), 1998, pp. 361-368
In this study we directly tested the hypothesis that isometric strengt
h training increases voluntary drive to muscles. In addition, it was a
ttempted to replicate the findings of an earlier study that showed ima
gined training increases voluntary strength as much as actual training
, as this finding provides key support for the hypothesis that trainin
g increases voluntary drive (Yue & Cole 1992). Fifty-four subjects wer
e randomly allocated to groups that performed 8 weeks of isometric tra
ining of the elbow flexor muscles, imagined isometric training, or a c
ontrol task involving the lower limbs. Voluntary isometric strength an
d activation of the elbow flexor muscles were measured before and afte
r training. Voluntary activation was measured with a sensitive form of
twitch interpolation. Training, imagined training and control groups
increased voluntary isometric elbow flexor strength by means of 17.8%
(+/-3.1 SEM), 6.8% (+/-2.6) and 6.5% (+/-3.0), respectively. The train
ing group increased in strength significantly more than imagined train
ing and control groups (P = 0.01 for both comparisons), but the small
difference between imagined training and control groups was not signif
icant (P = 0.31). Prior to training, voluntary activation of all subje
cts was high (96.2 +/- 0.5%). This did not change significantly with t
raining and there were no significant differences between groups. Thes
e data challenge the hypothesis that training of the elbow flexor musc
les increases isometric strength by inducing adaptations of the centra
l nervous system, because they show that training does not increase vo
luntary activation and imagined training does not increase strength.