Baldwin (1983) asks whether a firm can credibly deter union opportunis
m that would lead to underinvestment. We show that the punishments Bal
dwin considers credible exclude tougher threats that only have the app
earance of being self-destructive. If the firm's discount factor is su
fficiently close to one, union opportunism can indeed be deterred. Mor
eover, we show that given the firm's discount factor, a shorter lifeti
me of capital does not necessarily promote efficiency. Although, as Ba
ldwin emphasizes, it does enhance the firm's ability to punish union o
pportunism, it also creates adverse incentives for the firm to engage
in opportunistic employment cuts.