DIFFERENCES IN KINETICS OF INDUCTION AND REVERSIBILITY OF TCDD-INDUCED CHANGES IN CELL-PROLIFERATION AND CYP1A1 EXPRESSION IN FEMALE SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RAT-LIVER
Nj. Walker et al., DIFFERENCES IN KINETICS OF INDUCTION AND REVERSIBILITY OF TCDD-INDUCED CHANGES IN CELL-PROLIFERATION AND CYP1A1 EXPRESSION IN FEMALE SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RAT-LIVER, Carcinogenesis (New York. Print), 19(8), 1998, pp. 1427-1435
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a potent tumor promoter
in two-stage initiation-promotion models and induces cell proliferatio
n and development of enzyme-altered hepatic foci, It is believed that
increased cell proliferation is a necessary step in carcinogenesis, Th
erefore, the analysis of the effect of TCDD on cell proliferation in r
at liver may aid in the understanding of the mechanism of hepatocarcin
ogenesis induced by TCDD, The aim of this study was to investigate the
time course and reversibility of cell proliferation in non-initiated
and diethylnitrosamine-initiated female rats exposed biweekly to a dai
ly averaged dose of 125 ng TCDD/kg/day for up to 60 weeks. In addition
we evaluated the suitability of different dose metrics for the evalua
tion of TCDD-induced changes in cell proliferation and CYP1A1 enzyme i
nduction. Cell proliferation was measured as the incorporation of 5-br
omo-2' -deoxyuridine (BrdU) into hepatocytes undergoing replicative DN
A synthesis. Mean BrdU labeling indices in TCDD-treated animals were n
ot increased over controls after 14 weeks exposure, but were increased
8- and 2-fold after 30 and 60 weeks) treatment respectively, despite
similar liver levels of TCDD at all these times (23-30 p.p.b.). In com
parison, CYP1A1 activity, as measured by ethoxyresorufin deethylase ac
tivity, was significantly induced at all times points analyzed. Sixtee
n weeks following cessation of TCDD treatment, labeling indices were s
till significantly elevated over controls, but after 30 weeks of withd
rawal, labeling indices were no different from controls, indicating th
at TCDD-induced changes in cell proliferation were reversible. Dosimet
ric analysis indicated that rat liver tissue burden was suitable for p
rediction of CYP1A1 expression but not cell proliferation and that the
area under the curve was unsuitable for prediction of both TCDD-induc
ed changes in CYP1A1 expression and cell proliferation.