L. Lieberman et al., CARDIAC REHABILITATION - GENDER DIFFERENCES IN FACTORS INFLUENCING PARTICIPATION, Journal of women's health, 7(6), 1998, pp. 717-723
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Women s Studies","Medicine, General & Internal","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
This study investigates gender differences in the barriers and incenti
ves that are most influential in the coronary patient's decision to pa
rticipate in cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) and suggests strat
egies to counter these barriers. Patient surveys were administered to
consecutive English-speaking attenders and referred nonattenders to a
cardiac rehabilitation center at a university healthcare system in Tor
onto, Canada. A survey questionnaire, constructed from a literature re
view and advice from key informants, examined potential factors affect
ing decisions to engage in CRPs. One hundred twenty-nine attenders at
a CRP and 61 referred nonattenders completed the questionnaire. Physic
ian recommendation was reported to be the most important factor influe
ncing both women's and men's decisions to participate in CRPs, followe
d by encouragement from family members. For women who had attended CRP
, encouragement from their adult children was significantly more influ
ential than it was for men. Attention to health promotion was also a s
ignificantly more powerful motivator for women than it was for men. Fo
r CRP nonattenders, concomitant illness, transportation problems, and
inconvenient timing of the program were stated to be the three most im
portant barriers to CRP participation in both sexes, although women ra
ted concomitant illness as a significantly more powerful barrier than
did men. The decision to participate in CRPs involves several factors,
some of which are different or more important for women. As physician
recommendations continue to be the single most important factor in mo
tivating both men and women to attend, strengthened and increased phys
ician endorsement will likely encourage higher levels of participation
in CRPs. For women, permission should be sought to discuss the advant
ages of CRPs with adult children who are apparently influential in the
decision. As women nonattenders are more concerned than men about the
effects of concomitant illnesses, reassurance should be provided abou
t customized programs and exercise targets that consider the needs and
limitations of individuals with other health conditions.