CYTOKERATIN MARKERS IN MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA

Citation
B. Nisman et al., CYTOKERATIN MARKERS IN MALIGNANT PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA, Cancer detection and prevention, 22(5), 1998, pp. 416-421
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
0361090X
Volume
22
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
416 - 421
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-090X(1998)22:5<416:CMIMPM>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Previously available serum tumor markers had a low clinical value in m alignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The recently developed tissue pol ypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and CYFRA 21-1 assays identify the sol uble cytokeratin 18 and 19 fragments, respectively. In MPM these cytok eratins are expressed and may therefore be used as serum tumor markers . In this preliminary study, TPS and CYFRA 21-1 assays were evaluated to determine their potential for management of patients with MPM. Carc inoembryonic antigen (CEA) was evaluated as an additional marker. The study group consisted of 95 patients with benign lung and pleural dise ases (BLPD), 14 patients with MPM, 41 patients with adenocarcinoma of lung (AC), and 40 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of lung (SQC). The utilized cutoff points corresponded to a 95% specificity for pati ents with BLPD. In MPM, TPS showed greater sensitivity (64.3%) than CY FRA 21-1 (50.0%), while CEA showed no sensitivity. In SQC, the marker CYFRA 21-1 had the highest sensitivity (52.5%), whereas in AC the most sensitive marker was CEA (56.1%). Significantly lower levels of CEA w ere found in MPM compared with BLPD (p < 0.001) or AC and SQC (p < 0.0 001). Conversely, TPS levels in MPM were significantly higher than in SQC (p < 0.05). Close correlation of various individual pretreatment m arker levels was observed only between TPS and CYFRA. 21-1, both in MP M (r = 0.84; p < 0.001) and in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (r = 0.71; p < 0.001). In serial determinations of the markers during chem otherapy of MPM (n = 10), TPS and CYFRA 21-1 were shown to demonstrate more or less the same pattern of reactivity, although the changes in the TPS levels better reflected the clinical response to therapy. In c onclusion, TPS seems to be a more sensitive marker than CYFRA 21-1.