This study was conducted to determine whether alcoholics' memory diffi
culties are due, in part, to access (retrieval) or to availability (re
tention) deficits. Forty-four alcoholics (n = 20 females) and 44 contr
ols (n = 22 females) teamed a paired associate list consisting of 12 a
djective-CCC trigram pairs. Half of the subjects in each group leaned
the list to a low degree of learning (DCL; 4/12 pairs); the remainder
to a high DOL (8/12 pairs). Two distinct environmental contexts (provi
ding implicit cues) were used during acquisition. Subjects then comple
ted a cued recall tan explicit cue) test in either the same or a diffe
rent room. Alcoholics were significantly inferior in the acquisition p
hase on trials required to reach criterion, regardless of DCL required
[F(1,68) = 10.92, p = 0.002]. The main effect for implicit cuing was
not significant; similarly, there were no significant interactions. In
contrast, the explicit cue manipulation produced a significant group
x DOL interaction on the number of trigrams correctly recalled [F = (1
,77) = 6.38, p = 0.01]; alcoholics' recall did not benefit from the hi
gher DCL in contrast to a significant improvement in recall by control
s. The failure of alcoholics to demonstrate improvement with higher le
vels of learning is consistent with a deficit in the availability of i
nformation. The results confirm previous reports of recovering alcohol
ics' verbal leaning and memory dysfunction, and suggest that these def
icits may be attributed, in part, to a deficit in the availability of
information (retention).