Studies have documented that animals with positive energy budgets tend
to prefer feeding sites offering constant amounts of food over those
offering variable amounts of food. The present study tested whether Ja
ck Dempsey cichlids (Cichlasoma octofasciatum) in a two-patch environm
ent preferred the patch offering a constant amount of food over the on
e offering a variable amount of food. The study also examined (1) whet
her fish displayed shifts in risk sensitivity when they were allowed o
nly one choice per trial (discrete-choice treatment), as opposed to wh
en they could freely sample both alternatives (free-choice treatment),
and (2) whether or not fish displayed shifts in risk sensitivity betw
een the first trial of the day, when they were hungrier, and the final
trial of the day, when they were more satiated. Two of six fish signi
ficantly preferred the constant alternative and one showed a numerical
preference for the constant alternative that approached significance.
The mean proportion of first choices to the constant side did not dif
fer significantly between the discrete-choice treatment and the free-c
hoice treatment. In the discrete-choice treatment, however, fish were
significantly more risk averse in the first trial of daily sessions th
an in the final trial - a shift in risk sensitivity opposite to that s
een in a number of other studies. This suggests that animals may pass
through more than one threshold in risk sensitivity on different point
s along an energy budget continuum.