Background Evidence on the association between socioeconomic status an
d the prevalence of neurotic disorder is contradictory. We studied the
association between three elements of socioeconomic status and the pr
evalence of neurotic psychiatric disorder in a representative sample o
f adults aged 16-64 living in private households in the UK. Methods A
cross-sectional survey of 10 108 adults aged 16-65 resident in private
households in the UK was selected by a multi-stage, clustered, random
-sampling design. Neurotic disorders were defined using a standardised
interview, the revised clinical interview schedule (CIS-R). Data for
9570 people were available for this study. Findings We used housing te
nure and access to cars as measures of standard of living; both were a
ssociated with the prevalence of neurotic disorder even after adjustme
nt for other socioeconomic and demographic variables. including Regist
rar General's Social Class and educational attainment. Those people wi
th no access to a car had an odds ratio for neurotic disorder of 1.4 (
95% CI 1.1-1.7), compared with those who had access to two or more car
s. People who rented their homes were also at increased risk (1.3 [1.1
-1.5]). We estimated that about 10% of the neurotic disorder in the UK
could be attributed to the increased prevalence of those without cars
who rented their homes. There was a complex interaction between Regis
trar General's Social Class and sex, and there was no independent asso
ciation with educational attainment. Interpretation There is an indepe
ndent association between low standard of living and the prevalence of
neurotic psychiatric disorder. The UK has experienced one of the larg
est Increases In income inequality within western market economies ove
r the past 20 years, and this inequality may have had adverse conseque
nces for the mental health of the population.