AN OPEN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ZIDOVUDINE PLUS LAMIVUDINE VERSUS STAVUDINE PLUS LAMIVUDINE

Citation
Na. Foudraine et al., AN OPEN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ZIDOVUDINE PLUS LAMIVUDINE VERSUS STAVUDINE PLUS LAMIVUDINE, AIDS, 12(12), 1998, pp. 1513-1519
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,"Infectious Diseases",Virology
Journal title
AIDSACNP
ISSN journal
02699370
Volume
12
Issue
12
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1513 - 1519
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-9370(1998)12:12<1513:AORCTO>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Objective: To compare the antiretroviral effect and safety of zidovudi ne (ZDV)-lamivudine (3TC) with that of stavudine (d4T)-3TC. Methods: I n an open randomized controlled trial antiretroviral therapy-naive pat ients who had CD4+ counts greater than or equal to 200 x 10(6)/l and p lasma HIV RNA load greater than or equal to 10 000 copies/ml were rand omized to receive ZDV-3TC (200 mg three times daily and 150 mg twice d aily, respectively) or d4T-3TC (40 mg and 150 mg, both twice daily). I f the plasma HIV RNA level at week 8 or thereafter was > 500 copes/mi, indinavir was added at the next scheduled visit. Genotypic resistance analysis of the reverse transcriptase gene was performed at week 0 an d 12.Results over 24 weeks were reported. Results: Forty-seven patient s were treated (24 took ZDV-3TC; 23 took d4T-3TC). Plasma HIV RNA leve ls decreased from median 4.80 to 3.15 log(10) copies/mi (ZDV-3TC, P < 0.0001) and from 4.98 to 3.03 log(10) copies/ml (d4T-3TC, P < 0.0001) after 12 weeks of treatment. Indinavir was added at week 12 in 11 out of 21 patients with ZDV-3TC and in 10 out of 22 patients with d4T-3TC. Median virus load at week 24 was 2.41 log(10) and 2.29 log(10) copies /mi (P = 0.14), respectively. Seventy-five per cent (15 out of 20; ZDV -3TC) and 95% (18 out of 19; d4T-3TC) of patients had a virus load of < 500 copies/ml. Genomic evidence for 3TC resistance was found in all patients tested (11/11 ZDV-3TC and 12/12 d4T-3TC). At week 12, CD4 cel l counts had increased with a median of 110 x 10(6)/l in the ZDV-3TC g roup (baseline, 315 x 10(6)/l) and a median of 115 x 10(6)/l in the d4 T-3TC groupo (baseline 290 x 10(6)/l). At week 24, the median increase s were 90 and 120 x 10(6)/l, respectively. Overall the increase of CD4 + cells was higher in the d4T-3TC group (P = 0.02). Conclusion: d4T-3T C is at least as effective as ZDV-3TC, but 3TC resistance emerged in a ll patients investigated. The virological response of the dual nucleos ide combination is of short duration. However, after addition of indin avir the virus load could be reduced to < 500 copies/mi in the majorit y of patients. The increase in CD4+ cell count was significantly great er in the d4T-3TC group. To prevent 3TC resistance, the drug should no t be used in regimens containing only two nucleosides, irrespective th e virus load at baseline. (C) 1998 Lippincott-Raven Publishers.