Split shear wave arrivals are analyzed in seismograms from local earth
quakes in southern Hawaii recorded at five temporary arrays and one pe
rmanent network station. We identify split shear wave arrivals by thei
r orthogonally polarized pulses, linear particle motions, and similar
waveforms and estimate the delay time for the slow shear wave arrival
(S-2) using a waveform cross-correlation method. Consistent leading sh
ear wave polarizations were measured at the majority of our stations.
Comparison of observed and predicted shear wave polarizations confirms
that the former are due to anisotropy rather than earthquake source m
echanism. Agreement between fast shear wave (S-1) polarizations and in
dependently estimated directions of the maximum horizontal compressive
stress (sigma(H)) for the Ainapo and Punaluu Gulch arrays leads us to
conclude that the predominant source of the observed anisotropy for t
hese two areas is stress-aligned cracks consistent with the extensive
dilatancy anisotropy (EDA) hypothesis. Two distinct S-1 polarization d
irections were observed over distances less than 1 km for the Bird Par
k and South Flank arrays. S-1 polarizations parallel to the NE strikin
g Kaoiki Pall fault system for the Bird Park array combined with a non
horizontal maximum principal stress (sigma(1)) for the South Flank reg
ion suggest stress-induced cracks aligned by nearby faulting as a sour
ce for the observed anisotropy. Large station-to-station variations in
S-1 polarization and the relationship between delay time and event de
pth for arrays in the Kaoiki and South Flank regions provide evidence
for anisotropy that is predominantly shallow rather than pervasive. Av
erage delay times for the five arrays vary from about 100 to 230 ms, w
ith standard deviations of the order of 30 ms. Estimated anisotropic v
elocity variations and crack densities exceeding 10% indicate that the
upper crust of southern Hawaii is highly fractured. A search for poss
ible temporal changes in delay time associated with the 1983 Kaoiki ma
in shock (M(L) = 6.6), at a station near the epicenter, finds no evide
nce for change.