THYROID-HORMONE RESPONSE ELEMENTS DIFFERENTIALLY MODULATE THE INTERACTIONS OF THYROID-HORMONE RECEPTORS WITH 2 RECEPTOR-BINDING DOMAINS IN THE STEROID-RECEPTOR COACTIVATOR-1

Citation
A. Takeshita et al., THYROID-HORMONE RESPONSE ELEMENTS DIFFERENTIALLY MODULATE THE INTERACTIONS OF THYROID-HORMONE RECEPTORS WITH 2 RECEPTOR-BINDING DOMAINS IN THE STEROID-RECEPTOR COACTIVATOR-1, The Journal of biological chemistry, 273(34), 1998, pp. 21554-21562
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
ISSN journal
00219258
Volume
273
Issue
34
Year of publication
1998
Pages
21554 - 21562
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9258(1998)273:34<21554:TREDMT>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Ligand-dependent transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors is me diated by interactions with coactivators. Recently, a consensus intera ction motif (LXXLL) has been identified in a number of coactivators su ch as steroid receptor coactivator-l (SRC-1). SRC-1 contains three suc h motifs in the central (nuclear receptor binding domain-1, NBD-1) and a single one in the C-terminal (NBD-S) regions. To define the nature and role of the two NBDs in SRC-1, interaction studies between the two NBDs and thyroid hormone receptor (TR) were performed. Although NBD-1 and NBD-S showed similar ligand- and AF-a dependent interactions with TR, in solution, these two NBDs possessed distinct interaction proper ties with TR when TR is bound to a thyroid hormone-response element (T RE). Both in vitro and in vivo interaction studies demonstrate that NB D-1, but not NBD-2, exhibits ligand-dependent interaction with TR in t he presence of TREs. In addition, a natural isoform of SRC-1, SRC-1E, which lacks NBD-2, preserved TR as well as progesterone receptor-media ted coactivator function on reporter gene expression. Finally, we foun d that NBD-1 failed to interact with a TR and retinoid X receptor hete rodimer complex on a transcriptionally inactive direct repeat +4 TRE i n electrophoretic mobility shift assays. These observations indicate t hat DNA-induced, as well as ligand-induced, conformational change(s) o f TR may influence the nature of its binding to SRC-1, and that the tw o NBDs of SRC-I may play different roles to regulate ligand-dependent transactivation of TRs.