Is there a danger that sociological approaches to law end up creating
law in their own image? Can they set their own limits? Could they help
further rather than hinder the process by which law becomes more tech
nocratic? Continuing a debate with Roger Cotterrell, this paper offers
an examination of Cotterrell's suggestion, in the last issue, that th
ese dangers can be avoided provided that sociological interpretation o
f legal ideas recognizes an allegiance to law rather than to academic
sociology. By contrast, I propose a reflexive strategy intended to inv
ite sociology? to examine the ways in which its discourses and practic
es are both similar to bur also different from those of law.