Rk. Yerrick et al., WERE JUST SPECTATORS - A CASE-STUDY OF SCIENCE TEACHING, EPISTEMOLOGY, AND CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT, Science education (Salem, Mass.), 82(6), 1998, pp. 619-648
Project 2061, Benchmarks, and National Standards for Science Education
are forwarding a vision for science teacher educators in which a cons
tructivist teaching perspective is implicit. Included in these documen
ts is an epistemological treatment of scientific knowledge that contra
sts starkly with what researchers have found prolific in most science
classrooms. It is becoming a more mainstream perspective among science
educators that classrooms are places in which students and teachers j
ointly construct meaning from discursive events. Beliefs about the nat
ure of science and the purpose of school are not constructed in isolat
ion from one another. Rather, the philosophical treatment of science i
n classrooms, especially physics, has revealed that the dominant epist
emology is a strong predictor of the types of learning strategies depl
oyed by students. Given that the dominant epistemological treatment of
high school physics is of a positivist origin and the purpose of norm
al classroom discourse is to make classrooms operate smoothly, we ask
if the concerns of management are free from the influences of students
' beliefs of what science is and what school is for? Practical teacher
knowledge often quantizes the complexities of instruction, management
, concept development, and philosophical frameworks as separate and di
screte components of normal classroom science. Our purpose is to raise
the critical issue of understanding the nature of certain classroom m
anagement problems as we examine the interaction of two contrasting ep
istemological treatments of science ill a high school physics class an
d the subsequent classroom management techniques influenced by these b
eliefs. A physics teacher and his students were surveyed, interviewed,
and observed during normal instruction and a range of epistemological
commitments were identified. We argue that differences in epistemolog
ical stances can invoke antagonistic interactions that may not be well
understood from a purely management or pedagogical approach to teache
r knowledge and, inasmuch, classroom management choices made independe
nt of epistemological considerations miss the mark. (C) 1998 John Wile
y & Sons, Inc.