A new solution to the ecological inference problem is used to examine
split-ticket voting patterns across states and congressional districts
in the 1988 elections. Earlier studies of ticket splitting used eithe
r aggregate data, which suffer from the ''ecological fallacy'' and thr
eaten individual-level inferences, or survey data from small, unrepres
entative samples. We produce more accurate estimates of the proportion
s of voters splitting their ballots in each state and district which e
nables us to examine variations across geographical units. We also cla
rify the connection between ticket splitting and divided government an
d test several competing theories about the causes of both. We find co
ntrary to balancing arguments, that voters are not intentionally split
ting tickets to produce divided government and moderate policies. In m
ost cases split outcomes are a by-product of lopsided congressional ca
mpaigns that feature well-funded, high-quality candidates versus unkno
wn competitors.