Capital grants are the mainstay of most countries' regional-incentive
packages. From an economic point of view it is hard to understand why
governments choose to give subsidies to reduce the cost of capital. Fo
r if the objective is to reduce the unemployment problem in a specific
district, it seems reasonable to encourage labor-intensive firms to e
stablish production in that region. In this article, I discuss this di
screpancy between the policy usually recommended by economists and the
policy carried out by politicians. I show that giving capital grants
can be the best regional policy if important dynamic aspects of the po
licy problem are considered.