Se. Hankinson et al., TUBAL-LIGATION, HYSTERECTOMY, AND RISK OF OVARIAN-CANCER - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 270(23), 1993, pp. 2813-2818
Objective.-To assess whether tubal ligation and hysterectomy affect su
bsequent risk of ovarian cancer. Design.-Prospective cohort study with
12 years of follow-up. Setting.-United States, multistate. Participan
ts.-A total of 121 700 female registered nurses who were 30 to 55 year
s of age in 1976; the follow-up rate was 90% as of 1988. Main Outcome
Measure.-Ovarian cancer of epithelial origin confirmed by medical reco
rd review. Results.-We observed a strong inverse association between t
ubal ligation and ovarian cancer, which persisted after adjustment for
age, oral contraceptive use, parity, and other ovarian cancer risk fa
ctors (multivariate relative risk [RR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval
[CI], 0.16 to 0.64). The association was similar when we assessed tuba
l ligation status at the baseline questionnaire and excluded cases in
the first 4 years to eliminate any possible short-term decrease in ris
k due to screening of the ovaries during ligation surgery. We noted a
weaker inverse association between simple hysterectomy and ovarian can
cer (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.00). Neither vasectomy nor condom use
by a partner was associated with risk of ovarian cancer. Conclusions.
-These data indicate that tubal ligation, and perhaps hysterectomy, ma
y substantially reduce risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.