U. Klotz et al., EXPRESSION OF INTESTINAL DRUG-METABOLIZING-ENZYMES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY BOWEL-DISEASE, Current therapeutic research, 59(8), 1998, pp. 556-563
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Medicine, Research & Experimental
The cause of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear,
A recent hypothesis suggests that ulcerative colitis may be caused by
one or more reactive xenobiotic metabolites. If so, the presence, dis
tribution, and activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes in the gut could
be important, because those enzymes represent a first defense against
ingested xenobiotics. To assess whether patients with IBD express cert
ain enzymes differently in the gastrointestinal tract than do subjects
without IBD, biopsy samples of the terminal ileum and various regions
of the colon were stained immunohistochemically for cytochrome P-450
(CYP) isoenzymes (CYP1A1, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A), epoxide hydrolase, a
lpha and pi forms of glutsithione-S-transferase (GST), and metallothio
nein (MTTH). One hundred fifty biopsy samples from 21 patients with ir
ritable colon (no clinical or histologic signs of inflammation; contro
l group), 25 patients with crohn's disease (CD), and 37 patients with
ulcerative colitis (UC) mere evaluated. The patients' sex, age, smokin
g habits, and disease state were not related significantly to the freq
uency of positive versus negative staining of the samples. All enzymes
were expressed less frequently in the colon than in the terminal ileu
m. With the exception of CYP1A1, all enzymes were detectable with simi
lar frequency in the three study groups: CYP2E1, 77.4% to 84.6% positi
ve stainings; CYP3A, 53.8% to 58.5%; CPP2D6, 23.1% to 36.9%; GST(alpha
), 14.1% to 20.8%; GST(pi), 19.2% to 24.5%; epoxide hydrolase, 1.9% to
3.8% ;and MTTH, 19.2% to 25.4%. However, CYP1A1 staining was positive
significantly more often in patients with CD (39.6%) and UC (39.4%) t
han in patients in the control group (19.2%). Because cells with CYP1A
1 were found in the intestines of patients with IBD significantly more
frequently than in patients in the control group (ie, with an irritab
le colon), this may suggest a function of this enzyme in the etiology
or pathogenesis of inflammation in these disorders. Alternatively, the
more frequent expression of CYP1A1 could be due secondarily to the pr
esence of xenobiotics that then lead to inflammation.