Sperm morphology has always been considered an important tool in evalu
ating a man's fertilizing potential. The objective of this multicentri
c study was to evaluate intra- and interindividual variability and bet
ween-laboratory variation using the same or different criteria of sper
m morphology assessment. Semen samples were obtained from 20 males and
32 smears were made of all samples. Eighty coded smears (4 per patien
t) were sent to 8 laboratories for morphology assessment. The centers
applied different classification systems (strict criteria, WHO 1987, D
usseldorf criteria) and participants were asked to analyze the 80 smea
rs twice, with an interval of 1 week between each participant's two an
alyses. Intraclass correlations between repeats showed that sperm morp
hology can be assessed with acceptable within observer reproducibility
. Expected increases in imprecision were observed up to coefficients o
f variation of >30% with decreasing morphology scores, regardless of t
he classification system used. Agreement in correct classification of
samples as normal/abnormal was obtained in 80% of cases. Differences i
n reproducibility between slides may reflect an important source of he
terogeneity due to smear preparation. These results emphasize the impo
rtance of external quality control systems to improve the value of spe
rm morphology assessments in the investigation of the male partner in
a subfertile couple.