An interpretation of the electromagnetic energy flux at high latitudes
under steady state conditions is presented and analyzed through model
ing of the large-scale coupling between the high-latitude ionosphere a
nd magnetosphere. In this paper we elucidate the steady state relation
ship between the electromagnetic energy flux (divergence of the de Poy
nting flux), the Joule heating rate, and the mechanical energy transfe
r rate in the high-latitude ionosphere. We also demonstrate the import
ant role of the neutral wind and its conductivity-weighted distributio
n with altitude in determining the resultant exchange of electromagnet
ic energy at high latitudes. Because the Poynting flux approach accoun
ts for the neutral wind implicitly and describes the net electro-magne
tic energy flux between the magnetosphere and ionosphere, it is a fund
amental measure of energy transfer in the system. A significant portio
n of this energy transfer results in Joule heating; however, the conve
rsion of electromagnetic energy flux into mechanical energy of the neu
trals is also considerable and can in some regions exceed the Joule he
ating rate. We will show that neglect of the neutral dynamics in calcu
lations of the Joule heating rate can be misleading. To evaluate and i
nterpret the electromagnetic energy flux at high latitudes, we employ
the vector spherical harmonic model, which is based on the National Ce
nter for Atmospheric Research thermosphere-ionosphere general circulat
ion model, to provide the steady state properties of the thermosphere-
ionosphere system under moderate to quiet geomagnetic activity. For th
e specific geophysical conditions modeled we conclude that (1) the ele
ctromagnetic energy flux is predominantly directed into the high-latit
ude ionosphere with greater input in the morning sector than in the ev
ening sector, as supported by DE 2 observations. (2) The Joule heating
rate accounts for much of the electromagnetic energy deposited in the
ionosphere with the conductivity-weighted neutral wind contributing s
ignificantly to the Joule healing rate and thus affecting the net elec
tromagnetic energy flux in the ionosphere. (3) On average, the mechani
cal energy transfer rate amounts to about 10% to 30% of the net electr
omagnetic energy flux in the auroral dawn, dusk, and polar cap regions
, acting as a sink of electromagnetic energy flux in the dawn and dusk
sectors and a source in the polar cap. (4) Weak regions of upward ele
ctromagnetic energy flux are found near the convection reversal bounda
ries where the mechanical energy transfer rate exceeds the Joule heati
ng rate. In general, large upward electromagnetic energy fluxes may be
rare, as the always positive-Joule heating rate increases irrespectiv
e of the source of electromagnetic energy flux; that is, neutral dynam
ics contribute directly to the Joule heating rate.