STRONG AGREEMENT AND IDENTIFICATION - EVIDENCE FROM ELLIPSIS IN ENGLISH

Authors
Citation
A. Lobeck, STRONG AGREEMENT AND IDENTIFICATION - EVIDENCE FROM ELLIPSIS IN ENGLISH, Linguistics, 31(5), 1993, pp. 777-811
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics","Language & Linguistics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00243949
Volume
31
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
777 - 811
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-3949(1993)31:5<777:SAAI-E>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
I propose that ellipted constituents in English DP (N' ellipsis), CP ( sluicing), and IP (VP ellipsis) are empty, non-NP pronominals, license d and identified under the same condition that constrains nonarbitrary NP pro: [e] must be governed by an X-0 specified for strong agreement . Strong agreement must be broadened to include features that identify non-NP pro, an empty category that crucially differs from NP pro in a lso requiring reconstruction for its content to be fully recovered The analysis explains several ungrammatical ellipsis patterns in DP, CP, and IP, and why ellipsis fails in lexical categories and the functiona l category DEGP in English. The account is supported by ellipsis patte rns in German, French, and Malay.