R. King et al., CLINICAL AND IN-SITU CELLULAR-RESPONSES TO HAEMOPHILUS-DUCREYI IN THEPRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF HIV-INFECTION, International journal of STD & AIDS, 9(9), 1998, pp. 531-536
We aimed to determine if the clinical and histological features of cha
ncroid are altered by HIV infection. Male patients presenting to the N
airobi special treatment clinic with a clinical diagnosis of chancroid
were eligible for the study. A detailed history, physical examination
, swabs for Haemophilus ducreyi culture and blood for HIV serology, sy
philis serology and CD4 counts were obtained from all patients. Punch
biopsies from an ulcer were obtained from 10 patients and either fixed
in 10% formalin or snap frozen in Optimum Cutting Temperature (OCT) m
edium compound at -70 degrees C. Patients were treated with erythromyc
in and followed for 3 weeks. Chi-square and Student's t-test were used
to determine if the clinical and laboratory features of chancroid dif
fered between HIV-seropositive and seronegative individuals. Cox regre
ssion survival analysis was used to determine if HIV infection altered
cure rates of chancroid at 21 days. Immunohistochemical staining was
performed using lymphocytic and macrophage markers and tissue sections
were analysed by 2 pathologists in a blinded manner. Between February
and November 1994, 109 HIV-seropositive and 211 HIV-seronegative indi
viduals were enrolled in the study. HIV patients had ulcers of longer
duration than HIV-seronegative patients (P=0.03). Although cure rates
were similar at 3 weeks, HIV patients had lower cure rates at 1 week (
23% v 54%, P=0.002). A dense interstitial and perivascular inflammator
y infiltrate extending from the reticular to deep dermis was present i
n all biopsies. This consisted of equal amounts of CD4 and CD8 T-lymph
ocytes as well as macrophages. The histological and immunohistochemica
l picture was identical for HIV-positive and negative patients. HIV in
fection slows the healing rates of chancroid ulcers despite appropriat
e antibiotic therapy. This clinical difference cannot be attributed to
an altered histopathological response to HN infection. Additional stu
dies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for this findi
ng.