Y. Sherer et al., COMPARATIVE CLINICAL-STUDY OF CEFONICID, CHLORAMPHENICOL, AND PENICILLIN IN COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2(3), 1998, pp. 343-348
Community-acquired pneumonia is one of the most common infectious cond
itions that require hospitalization. When intravenous treatment is ind
icated, cefonicid is usually the drug of choice. The aim of this study
was to find out if chloramphenicol, which is superior to the standard
drugs from a financial point of view, could serve as an equally effic
ient treatment, especially in the elderly. The outcomes of 3 pneumonia
patient groups who were either treated with cefonicid, chloramphenico
l or penicillin-a (n=59, 17, 24, respectively) were retrospectively co
mpared. Data about demographic characteristics of the patients, clinic
al outcomes, rehospitalization rates, duration of improvement/treatmen
t/ hospitalization and clinical laboratory tests were obtained from ea
ch patient's medical records. Only minor differences (even though occa
sionally significant) were found with respect to rehospitalization and
improvement rates, duration of hospitalization, treatment and improve
ment, death rates and clinical laboratory tests. However, chlorampheni
col patients were found to be significantly older than cefonicid patie
nts. Moreover, no bone-marrow suppression was associated with chloramp
henicol treatment. All 3 drugs tested seem to have the same efficacy.
We conclude that since chloramphenicol is as safe as, and much cheaper
than cefonicid, this antibiotic agent is not inferior to the others,
its usage in older patients with pneumonia should be considered.