Js. Matsumura et El. Chaikof, CONTINUED EXPANSION OF AORTIC NECKS AFTER ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS, Journal of vascular surgery, 28(3), 1998, pp. 422-430
Background: Longitudinal studies have revealed that the aortic segment
proximal to an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is at risk
for continued enlargement after a standard aneurysm repair. Similarly,
preliminary reports have shown expansion of one or both aortic necks
after endovascular repair. Although some investigators have suggested
that this may be a transient effect, continued dilatation at the endog
raft attachment site could effect the overall device stability. Method
s: As part of a multi-institutional trial of endovascular grafting for
the treatment of AAA, 59 patients were successfully implanted with st
raight endografts between February 1993 and January 1995. A morphometr
ic analysis of aortic neck size was undertaken with serial review of c
omputed tomography scans available through April 1997. The neck sizes
at both graft attachment sites were measured, with investigators blind
ed to patient identity and date of scan. Changes in minor diameter wer
e defined, annual interval expansion rates were calculated, and the da
ta were correlated with endoleak, device migration, aneurysm size chan
ge, endograft diameter, attachment system fractures, and initial preim
plant neck size. Results: Significant aortic neck enlargement, particu
larly at the level of the distal neck, was observed for at least 24 mo
nths after AAA repair. The annual interval dilation rates of the proxi
mal aortic neck were 0.7 +/- 2.1 mm/year (P = .023) and 0.9 +/- 1.9 (P
= .008) mm/year during the first and second years, respectively. Enla
rgement of the distal neck during the observation period was more mark
ed, with corresponding annual expansion rates of 1.7 +/- 2.9 mm/year (
P<.001) and 1.9 +/- 2.5 (P<.001) mm/year. In 5 patients (14%), the min
or diameter of the distal neck was at least 6 mm larger than the preim
plant diameter of the graft. Migration of the distal attachment system
was observed in 3 of these 5 patients. Expansion rates did not have a
statistically significant correlation with initial neck size, endogra
ft dimensions, aneurysm size change, presence of endoleak, or attachme
nt system fracture. Conclusions: Aortic neck enlargement was observed
for at least 2 years after endovascular grafting. Close patient follow
-up remains mandatory in Lieu of the potential risk of late failure as
a result of continued aortic expansion. The relative contribution of
device design to this phenomenon will need to be defined.