CONTINUED EXPANSION OF AORTIC NECKS AFTER ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS

Citation
Js. Matsumura et El. Chaikof, CONTINUED EXPANSION OF AORTIC NECKS AFTER ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS, Journal of vascular surgery, 28(3), 1998, pp. 422-430
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas
Journal title
ISSN journal
07415214
Volume
28
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
422 - 430
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(1998)28:3<422:CEOANA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background: Longitudinal studies have revealed that the aortic segment proximal to an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is at risk for continued enlargement after a standard aneurysm repair. Similarly, preliminary reports have shown expansion of one or both aortic necks after endovascular repair. Although some investigators have suggested that this may be a transient effect, continued dilatation at the endog raft attachment site could effect the overall device stability. Method s: As part of a multi-institutional trial of endovascular grafting for the treatment of AAA, 59 patients were successfully implanted with st raight endografts between February 1993 and January 1995. A morphometr ic analysis of aortic neck size was undertaken with serial review of c omputed tomography scans available through April 1997. The neck sizes at both graft attachment sites were measured, with investigators blind ed to patient identity and date of scan. Changes in minor diameter wer e defined, annual interval expansion rates were calculated, and the da ta were correlated with endoleak, device migration, aneurysm size chan ge, endograft diameter, attachment system fractures, and initial preim plant neck size. Results: Significant aortic neck enlargement, particu larly at the level of the distal neck, was observed for at least 24 mo nths after AAA repair. The annual interval dilation rates of the proxi mal aortic neck were 0.7 +/- 2.1 mm/year (P = .023) and 0.9 +/- 1.9 (P = .008) mm/year during the first and second years, respectively. Enla rgement of the distal neck during the observation period was more mark ed, with corresponding annual expansion rates of 1.7 +/- 2.9 mm/year ( P<.001) and 1.9 +/- 2.5 (P<.001) mm/year. In 5 patients (14%), the min or diameter of the distal neck was at least 6 mm larger than the preim plant diameter of the graft. Migration of the distal attachment system was observed in 3 of these 5 patients. Expansion rates did not have a statistically significant correlation with initial neck size, endogra ft dimensions, aneurysm size change, presence of endoleak, or attachme nt system fracture. Conclusions: Aortic neck enlargement was observed for at least 2 years after endovascular grafting. Close patient follow -up remains mandatory in Lieu of the potential risk of late failure as a result of continued aortic expansion. The relative contribution of device design to this phenomenon will need to be defined.