L. Versichelen et al., HEMODYNAMIC AND ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESPONSE TO INSERTION OF A CUFFED OROPHARYNGEAL AIRWAY - COMPARISON WITH THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 81(3), 1998, pp. 393-397
We have compared the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), a modified Gu
edel airway device with a specially designed cuff at its distal end, w
ith the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), on haemodynamic and electroenceph
alographic (EEG) responses to insertion. In addition, we examined the
haemodynamic and EEG changes during initiation of the effect-compartme
nt controlled infusion. We studied 35 female patients undergoing ambul
atory gynaecological surgery allocated randomly to received an LMA or
COPA to manage the airway. After premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg
kg(-1) i.v. and low-dose alfentanil (0.01 mg kg(-1)), anaesthesia was
induced and maintained with propofol, using an effect-compartment cont
rolled infusion set at an effect-site concentration of 4 mu g ml(-1).
After intercompartmental equilibration, the LMA (group I) or COPA (gro
up II) was inserted and haemodynamic (arterial pressure, heart rate) a
nd EEG (bispectral index (BIS)) responses to insertion studied. The ef
fect-compartment controlled infusion of propofol caused only mild haem
odynamic changes during induction. Changes in arterial pressure and he
art rate after insertion were similar in both groups and not significa
ntly different from baseline values before insertion. Changes in BIS a
fter insertion were minor and similar between groups.