ELDER-PROXY AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS AND MEDICAL HISTORY OF THE OLDER PERSON - THE IMPACT OF CAREGIVER BURDEN AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMATOLOGY
K. Long et al., ELDER-PROXY AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS AND MEDICAL HISTORY OF THE OLDER PERSON - THE IMPACT OF CAREGIVER BURDEN AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMATOLOGY, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46(9), 1998, pp. 1103-1111
OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of caregiver burden and depressiv
e symptomatology on elder-proxy response concordance regarding the old
er person's functional status and medical history. DESIGN: Cross-secti
onal study via telephone interviews. SETTING: Community-dwelling older
people and caregivers in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: 340 matched pa
irs of frail persons aged 65 and older and their respective caregivers
. MEASUREMENTS: Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The OARS metho
dology RESULTS: Percent agreement on the ADL items ranged from 97.6% o
n personal hygiene to 99.7% for toileting, with moderate kappa coeffic
ients. IADL percent agreement ranged from 71.5 to 93.7%, with fair to
moderate kappa coefficients. Agreement among the medical history items
ranged from 76.3 to 98.5% (kappa =.138-.831). Response bias for the I
ADL composite measure is influenced marginally by caregiver burden (F[
259] = 1.751, P =.098). Five of the individual IADL bias items are inf
luenced significantly by burden, such that an increase in burden resul
ts in a greater likelihood that the caregiver will overstate disabilit
y compared with the rating by the older person. Response bias on the A
DL scale was increased among persons who experienced more caregiver bu
rden (OR = 1.096, 95% CI = 1.000, 1.192) and those who spent more hour
s providing care (OR = 1.012, 95% CI = 1.001, 1.024). Additionally, bl
ack caregivers were more likely than white caregivers to disagree with
the older people on the ADL scale (OR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.642, 3.809).
A composite of the medical history items is influenced by the relatio
nship of the caregiver to the older person; bias is more likely among
adult children ((F[227] = 1.56, P =.081). CONCLUSION: Elder-proxy conc
ordance is highest among ADL items, followed by medical history items
and IADL items. Caregiver depressive symptomotology had no significant
impact on elder-proxy response concordance on any of the three outcom
es of interest: IADL and medical history bias and ADL disagreement. Ho
wever, caregiver burden was marginally predictive of bias on the total
ADL and IADL scales. Additionally, increased burden was significantly
predictive of bias on five of the seven individual items of the IADL
scale, suggesting that the more burden a caregiver feels, the greater
likelihood that s/he will overstate the older person's disability comp
ared with self-report. These findings suggest that clinicians and rese
archers who use proxy reports to determine treatment regimens and comp
lete data collection efforts may do so with confidence on ADL individu
al items and medical history items when the older person's frailty is
marginal. However, caregiver burden may result in misleading represent
ation of the older person's functional status, specifically in regard
to IADL items.