A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TRIAGE ANGIOGRAPHY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES INELIGIBLE FOR THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY - RESULTS OF THE MEDICINE VERSUS ANGIOGRAPHY IN THROMBOLYTIC EXCLUSION (MATE) TRIAL
Pa. Mccullough et al., A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TRIAGE ANGIOGRAPHY IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES INELIGIBLE FOR THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY - RESULTS OF THE MEDICINE VERSUS ANGIOGRAPHY IN THROMBOLYTIC EXCLUSION (MATE) TRIAL, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32(3), 1998, pp. 596-605
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine if early triage
angiography with revascularization, if indicated, favorably affects c
linical outcomes in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarctio
n who are ineligible for thrombolysis. Background. The majority of pat
ients with acute myocardial infarction and other acute coronary syndro
mes are considered ineligible for thrombolysis and therefore are not a
fforded the opportunity for early reperfusion. Methods. This multicent
er, prospective, randomized trial evaluated in a controlled fashion th
e outcomes following triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes in
eligible for thrombo lytic therapy. Eligible patients (n = 201) with <
24 h of symptoms were randomized to early triage angiography and subse
quent therapies based on the angiogram versus conventional medical the
rapy consisting of aspirin, intravenous heparin, nitroglycerin, beta-b
lockers, and analgesics. Results. In the triage angiography group, 109
patients underwent early angiography and 64 (58%) received revascular
ization, whereas in the conservative group, 54 (60%) subsequently unde
r went nonprotocol angiography in response to recurrent ischemia and 3
3 (37%) received revascularization (p = 0.001). The mean time to revas
cularization was 27 +/- 32 versus 88 +/- 98 h (p = 0.0001) and the pri
mary endpoint of recurrent ischemic events or death occurred in 14 (13
%) versus 31 (34%) of the triage angiography and conservative groups,
respectively (45% risk reduction, 95% CI 27-59%, p = 0.0002), There we
re no differences between the groups with respect to initial hospital
costs or length of stay. Long-term follow-up at a median of 21 months
revealed no significant differences in the endpoints of late revascula
rization, recurrent myocardial infarction, or all cause mortality. Con
clusions. Early triage angiography in patients with acute coronary syn
dromes who are not eligible for thrombolytics reduced the composite of
recurrent ischemic events or death and shortened the time to definiti
ve revascularization during the index hospitalization. Despite more fr
equent early revascularization after triage angiography,,fe found no l
ong term benefit in cardiac outcomes compared with conservative medica
l therapy with revascularization prompted by recurrent ischemia. (J Am
Cell Cardiol 1998;32:596-605) (C) 1998 by the American College of Car
diology.