U. Keller et al., ERBIUM-YAG LASER APPLICATION IN CARIES THERAPY - EVALUATION OF PATIENT PERCEPTION AND ACCEPTANCE, Journal of dentistry, 26(8), 1998, pp. 649-656
Objectives: In previous studies it has been demonstrated that the Er:Y
AG laser can be used to prepare cavities efficiently and without therm
al damage to the adjacent dental hard and soft tissues. To investigate
the patients' response to Er:YAG laser preparation of teeth, a prospe
ctive clinical study was performed in five dental hospitals. Methods:
To evaluate patients' perception and response to cavity preparation a
direct comparison was made between conventional mechanical preparation
and Er:YAG laser preparation of caries in dental hard tissues. Half o
f the preparations were completed by the laser alone with standardized
parameters, with the other half being mechanically prepared. The sequ
ential order of treatment was randomized, and clinical parameters such
as depth and location of the cavities were carefully balanced. A thre
e-score evaluation scheme of patient responses was used: comfortable,
uncomfortable. very uncomfortable. In addition the patients were asked
to decide which was the more uncomfortable form of treatment and the
preferred treatment for future caries therapy. Results: The study incl
uded 103 patients with 206 preparations distributed amongst 194 teeth.
All teeth gave vital responses (ice test) before and after both types
of treatment. The laser treatment was found to be more comfortable th
an the mechanical treatment. with high statistical significance. Durin
g treatment, the need for local anaesthesia was 11% for mechanical pre
paration compared to 6% during laser application. It was found that 80
% of the patients rated the conventional preparation as more uncomfort
able than the laser treatment and 82% of the patients indicated that t
hey would prefer the Er:YAG laser preparation for further caries treat
ment. Conclusions: The application of the Er:YAG laser system is a mor
e comfortable alternative or adjunctive method to conventional mechani
cal cavity preparation. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights rese
rved.