The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a bipolar abl
ation probe on experimentally roughened articular cartilage and compar
e it with the traditional mechanical shaving technique using the knee
joint of sheep. Twenty-eight skeletally mature ewes were divided rando
mly into two groups: one group was treated with a rotating shaving dev
ice and another group was treated using the bipolar ablation probe (Bi
polar Arthroscopic Probe; Electroscope, Inc, Boulder, CO). Animals wer
e killed at 0, 6, 12, and 24 weeks, and histological sections of the e
xperimental limbs were compared with sections of the opposite limb usi
ng a modified Mankin scale. The following variables were used to deter
mine scores: surface (0-6), cells (0-4), hypocellularity (0-3), matrix
staining (transitional zone [0-4], radiate zone [0-4], and focal empt
y lacunae or hypereosinophilic cells (0-3). Differences in scores for
all response variables were calculated as treated limb minus sham limb
. Response variables were formed: score >0 recoded as 1 (favorable res
ponse treated better than sham), score of 0 recoded as 2 (neutral resp
onse no differences), and score <0 recoded as 3 (unfavorable response
treated worse than sham). Bipolar ablative probe-treated limbs had 14.
29% favorable responses and 35.71% favorable or neutral responses, whe
reas shave-treated limbs had 0% favorable and only 7.14% favorable or
neutral responses. For all variables, bipolar ablative probe-treated l
imbs had more favorable responses. The less severe histological change
in the bipolar ablative probe-treated joints compared with the shave-
treated joints suggests that bipolar ablation of articular cartilage m
ay be a better treatment for chondromalacia than the usual shaving met
hods of debridement. Further, there were no pathological changes in th
e subchondral bone.