QUANTIFICATION OF ULTRASOUND EMBOLI SIGNALS IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC AND CAROTID DISEASE

Citation
Dg. Grosset et al., QUANTIFICATION OF ULTRASOUND EMBOLI SIGNALS IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC AND CAROTID DISEASE, Stroke, 24(12), 1993, pp. 1922-1924
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
StrokeACNP
ISSN journal
00392499
Volume
24
Issue
12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1922 - 1924
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-2499(1993)24:12<1922:QOUESI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The use of Doppler ultrasound to detect arteri al emboli has major implications for the classification and treatment of stroke. Experimental studies indicate that embolic materials produc e different ultrasound signals, depending on their acoustic properties . To examine the possibility of characterizing emboli of different sou rces in the clinical setting, we compared the emboli signals of patien ts with cardiac embolic sources with those of patients with signals of carotid embolic sources. Methods: Transcranial Doppler monitoring (30 minutes per patient) of the middle cerebral arteries was performed in 80 patients with prosthetic cardiac valves and 20 patients with inter nal carotid artery stenosis. The signal power of emboli was calculated in relation to the background Doppler signal. Results: In patients wh o were embolizing from prosthetic heart valves, the frequency of embol us signals was greater than in patients with carotid stenosis who were embolizing (mean+/-SEM: 58.2+/-11 versus 8.2+/-3 signals per hour, P< .0001, two-sample t test), and total signal power and duration also we re higher (power, 2231+/-63 versus 455+/-109 power units; duration, 55 .9+/-0.8 versus 29.9+/-1.4 milliseconds; both P<.001). The majority of emboli signals were seen during cardiac systole, especially in patien ts with carotid stenosis (89% in the first half of the cardiac cycle v ersus 72% in prosthetic valve patients). In 19 patients with prostheti c valves, embolus signals were also recorded from the anterior cerebra l artery; the signal count was not significantly different from the mi ddle cerebral artery (43.2+/-12.5 versus 64.3+/-16 per hour), but ante rior cerebral artery signals were of higher power (3306+/-148 versus 2 441+/-109 power units, P<.001). Conclusions: There is promise of being able to distinguish emboli on the basis of power measurements. Emboli of different sources (eg, carotid and cardiac) appear to have differe nt ultrasonic characteristics, which are likely to be based on composi tion and size.