S. Lopez et al., DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA NITROGEN IN THE URINE OF SMALL RUMINANTS, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 78(1), 1998, pp. 95-101
The objective of the present work was to compare colorimetric and dist
illation-titration methods to determine the ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) c
oncentration in sheep and goat urine samples. Colorimetric methods use
d were based on the indophenol reaction, whereas titrimetric methods w
ere based on the alkali distillation of ammonia from the urine and its
titrimetric determination with a standard acid. Colorimetric methods
were only reliable when urine samples were diluted at least 1:20. Both
colorimetric and alkali-distillation methods gave quantitative recove
ries with standard NH3-N solutions, but when NH3-N was determined in u
rine samples there was a significant discrepancy between analytical me
thods on the measured concentrations. These were between 1.3 and 10-fo
ld ton average 2.6-fold) higher with alkali distillation than with the
colorimetric method. The difference between concentrations measured b
y both analytical methods was significantly related (R-2 = 0.990; P <
0.001) to the concentration of urea in the urine samples. To study the
effect of urea concentration, standard solutions containing variable
concentrations of urea and NH3-N were prepared, and NH3-N concentratio
n determined by both methods. Concentrations measured by colorimetry w
ere similar to the actual concentrations irrespective of the urea conc
entration of the solutions. In urea-free solutions, alkali-distillatio
n methods gave values similar to the actual concentrations, but when u
rea was present observed values were consistently higher than the expe
cted concentrations. The overestimation increased with the urea concen
tration of the solutions, with a significant (P < 0.001) relationship
between both variables. Colorimetric methods were more reliable to mea
sure NH3-N concentrations in urine samples containing high urea concen
trations. (C) 1998 Society of Chemical Industry.